Sex of opponent influences response to a potential status signal in house sparrows

 

Wendy K. Hein, David F. Westneat, and Joseph P. Poston.

Animal Behaviour, 65:1211-1221.

 

ABSTRACT

            We evaluated the possible use of a sexually dimorphic plumage trait as a status signal in inter- and intra-sexual social interactions in free-living house sparrows (Passer domesticus).  Males with larger black throat patches (bibs) tended to be dominant regardless of the opponent’s sex. This relationship was maintained after controlling for body size and age in multivariate analyses. However, the nature of social interactions varied according to the sex of the opponent and a male’s bib size. Males with larger bibs tended to be less aggressive to male opponents, and received significantly less aggression from those birds, a key predicted benefit of a status signal. However, when the opponent was a female, males with large bibs displayed significantly more aggression than males with small bibs, and this relationship persisted even after controlling for the dominance status of the participants.  Females were significantly more aggressive to male opponents than to females, and females interacting with two males of known bib size were more aggressive to the one with the larger bib.  These results suggest that the bib of male house sparrows may be a signal of status, but that in interactions with females, the bib may also have other functions. Frequent testing by females of the underlying quality being signalled by the bib may be linked to later mate choice, and might be adaptive if the information value of the bib varies among years. Such testing may also contribute to mechanisms for maintaining the bib as a reliable signal of status.

 

The main result! Bib size is linked to aggression both displayed (top panels) and received (bottom panels), but that differs depending on whether the opponent is male (left panels) or female (right panels).